Über Takes Have a take
Music · 1958, twice · Take No. 016

Michael Jackson or Prince?

Born the same year, peaked the same decade, defined pop from opposite directions. One was the biggest star on earth; the other played every instrument on the record. Pick your king.

The case for

Michael Jackson

Gary, Indiana · 1958–2009

  • No. 1Thriller, the best-selling album of all time. Nothing before or since has come close.
  • 13Number-one singles as a solo artist, and five from a single album (Bad).
  • 1983Motown 25: the moonwalk, live, and pop performance has a before and after.
vs
The case for

Prince

Minneapolis · 1958–2016

  • 27Instruments credited to him on his debut album, at 19, which he also produced.
  • 1984Purple Rain: a No. 1 album, a No. 1 film and an Oscar, in the same year Thriller was still on the charts.
  • 1Solo, Super Bowl XLI, in the rain, 'Purple Rain.' The greatest halftime show, and it's not debated.

Cast your take

——
The verdict

It's Prince. Michael was the bigger star; Prince was the bigger musician.

Michael Jackson's scale is the largest in pop history, and his records are flawless. Thriller sold more than anything ever will again, and the dancing alone would make him immortal.

But Prince wrote, played, produced and performed his own catalogue at a level nobody else in pop has reached, and he did it for forty years without a collaborator he needed. Michael was the greatest performer; Prince was the greatest all-round musician. We're taking the musician.

Disagree? That's what the buttons are for.